剧情片

不是巧合，相依為命的父女、愛酒的父親、起眼的道具，都衝着小津而來。Claire Denis（《影舞者瑪德》）獻給小津之作，如果不說，你只能認得出運鏡如寫詩的簽名樣式，也不會知道兩人可以這麼近。憂鬱的藍夜，迷宮似的公路網，交織樓房之間的地鐵路軌，高超的場面調度先寫孤寂的城市個性，然後人物放進去，不用多話，戲便自然在了。不放心女兒的父親，不想去愛的女兒，宛如親人的鄰里，凝聚成親和力極強的世界，展開連綿故事。小津會認同：生命有時，人要懂得放下。

本片讲述了一个普通中学法语女教师的一天：索尼娅·贝尔杰拉克（伊莎贝拉·阿佳妮饰）像往常一样衣着随便、不施脂粉地走进排演戏剧的教室，这一天他们上课的主题是莫里哀然而学生们一如既往不将她放在眼里，甚至对其进行羞辱和嘲笑。两个男生爆发了争执，索尼娅上前干预，几人在争执中一支手枪从学生的书包里掉出。平凡的一天就这样脱离了轨道：女教师在企图争夺手枪的过程中误伤一名学生，在极度惊恐之下她平日里累积的精神压力完全爆发，她将学生押作人质。警察很快出动了，调解专家也试图与她对话。然而她用枪眼指着学生，同时一遍遍向他们灌输教育的价值…… <

　　新学期伊始，教师与学生们返回一所普通的社区学校。法语老师兼班主任的弗朗索瓦·马林（Fran?ois Bégaudeau 饰）面对升一年级的新班级，继续用坦诚又有些好辩的方式教学，这群14岁左右的学生思维活跃，时常在宽松的课堂上反诘马林或是斗嘴、传播八卦，马林不得不一次次中断进度，解决无数琐碎的问题。这所学校内汇聚了来自多国的移民学生，随之而来的问题时常在课堂细节中体现，马林试图尽量让学生们找到自尊，但这些擅于让老师头疼的孩子似乎不太接受马林的说辞。课堂上的唇枪舌剑与部分学生敌视老师的态度让潜藏着的矛盾随时会爆发。　　本片获2008年戛纳金棕榈奖，由小说原著兼编剧的Fran?ois Bégaudeau主演。

三个法国朋友开着一辆偷来的汽车上路，发现了一只会说话的受伤鹳——它声称已经逃离了阿尔及利亚军队——并帮助它逃到了德国亲戚的家中。

利基市场DVD厂牌Mondo Macabro发行了一部鲜为人知的1976年电影，名为《在地狱》（In Hell），被称为La tortura和Gloria Mundi。这部电影是已故希腊导演尼科斯·帕帕塔基斯（Nikos Papatakis）的创作，他显然...

一部204分钟长的电影，绝对需要磅礴浩大的题材。在这点上，意大利导演马利欧·迈图纳的《我们相信》是做到了。三个年少的伙伴受19世纪20年代法国大革命的影响，决定献身于争取民主的革命事业。电影中以三个伙伴在三个不同时间段中发生的纠葛和经历作为主线，同时以小见...

　　叛逆粗鲁的15岁少女露露（Chloé Coulloud 饰）和父母生活在法国幽静的乡村中，母亲茱莉叶特（Karin Viard 饰）体弱多病，在露露的记忆中，母亲从未展露快乐的一面，并且经常在夜晚独坐在长椅上，若有所思。　　偶然机会，露露在地窖发现一张母亲年轻时的照片，相片中母亲裸露上身，笑容灿烂。不久露露从外婆家翻到了一卷录像带，年轻时的母亲和一个名叫雅克（Kad Merad 饰）的英俊兽医相爱，无忧无虑，天荒地老。知道了母亲闷闷不乐的缘由，露露决定安排二人重逢，她原指望如今老而丑的雅克能击碎母亲的幻想，却未想到反使这对老情人的爱火重燃……

　　维克多（Paul Blain 饰）和妻子安妮特（Marie-Christine Friedrich 饰）结婚多年，两人共同养育着女儿帕梅拉（Victoire Rousseau 饰），一家人住在风景如诗如画的维也纳，日子平静之中充满了幸福。然而，让安妮特没有想到的是，维克多竟然沾染上了毒品，整日和毒贩们厮混在一起。　　回到巴黎后，维克多不仅没有改邪归正，反而变本加厉，一个幸福美满的家庭眼看着就要毁于一旦。在发现维克多不可能改变后，安妮特果断的带着帕梅拉离开了家，两人相依为命，隐姓埋名的生活着，一晃眼就是十一年过去。彼时的帕梅拉已经成长为了亭亭玉立的大女孩，童年时代不幸的经历让她对父亲充满了愤怒和怨怼。当帕梅拉得知自己的父亲依然活着，并且就和自己生活在同一个城市后，她决定去见一见他。

亚当（Emile Abossolo M'bo 饰）曾是一名非常优秀的游泳运动员，还得到过冠军的荣誉，如今，年近60的他早已经告别了赛道退出舞台，现在的亚当，是一家豪华酒店里的泳池救生员。因为酒店经营不善，导致遭人收购，被收购之后，一切亚当早已经习以为常的事...

　　Louis is a brooding loner who lives with two large white dogs in a forest near the French-Swiss border. His estranged son Sidney lives with his wife in a village nearby. Louis is carrying on an affair with the local pharmacist and carrying a torch for a beautiful, feral local dog breeder. He suffers a mild heart attack, and buys a new heart on the black market. Then he travels to South Korea, where he buys a boat and sails it to his former home, a dilapidated shack on a remote island south of Tahiti. His dream is to find the son he sired decades earlier when he lived there. However, once he is settled, his body begins to reject the alien heart.

　　1982年，比利时国家视觉艺术与传播技术高等学院邀请阿克曼担任一个学生工作坊的导师，她与工作坊学生一同编写剧本，并以总导演的身份创作了《洋槐旅馆》，讲述一名女子来到洋槐旅馆，她只给自己一天的时间找到她的爱人。

1980年代末的纽约温室世界中上演了一个关于生活失误的寓言，艺术市场和股票市场各自蓬勃发展，并在此过程中催生了“雅皮士”妄想的大杂烩，这些妄想仍然存在。在纽约学习的法国女演员安娜与一位成功的股票经纪人马克相遇，马克站在大都会的维米尔肖像前

François Gérane alterne internements et incarcérations, entrecoupés de quelques escapades furtives. ...

这是一部散文式的电影，表现的是生命在人群里的心灵孤单，影片通过时空交叉的手法，在看似杂乱无章的情节里以一个枪支经销商、一伙艺术品小偷、一帮疯狂的老男人、一个压抑的警察以及形形色色的怪人因为一幅被盗的19世纪的油画和一个 18 世纪破损的陶瓷餐盘落和入不同人手中的产生的不同故事，带出导演对艺术和生命偶然性的思索，导演让这种戏剧性匆忙了黑色幽默和人性的绝望，有着一种对流逝莫名的伤怀和法国电影特有的艺术情趣。    

1940 年，德国人入侵法国时，一名来自巴黎的上流社会下士被德国人俘虏。协助和陪同的人物包括情绪低落的奶农、服务员、目光短浅的知识分子、工人阶级的巴黎人和德国牙医助理，下士试图逃离战俘营，有时逃出几码，有时到达法国边境。

　　普泽（雅克·维列雷 Jacques Villeret 饰）是当地一名受人尊敬的小学老师，他还有另一个身份——小丑。一到星期天，他就带上家当，在戏团里表演令人捧腹的小丑独角戏。儿子鲁西恩十分不理解他这种行为，觉得父亲的表演令他难堪。普泽的好朋友安德（安德烈·杜索里埃 André Dussollier 饰）看出了鲁西恩的心思，于是向他讲起了一段往事。　　二战期间，在法国的一个小镇上，普泽和安德为了讨好他们心仪的一个姑娘，决定当一回抗战英雄。夜里，他们把德军占领的铁路设施炸毁了，同时也炸伤了一名法国老工人。不久，德军为了揪出凶手，就随机抽取四个本地男人作为人质，如果真凶不来投案，就枪决人质。不幸的是，普泽和安德也被抽中。人质被囚禁在一个深坑里，就在他们又冷又饿之时，坑口上出现了一个德国士兵。他对着四人做出各种滑稽动作，还把食物扔给他们，他说自己以前是马戏团里的小丑……

　　短片

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."?　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"? can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　After the tremendous popular success of the Fantômas novels, both of the major French film studios — Pathé and Gaumont — vied for the rights to produce films based on the series. Gaumont won, and from April 1913 to May 1914 Louis Feuillade directed five Fantômas films which critic David Thomson has described as "the first great movie experience."

金斯基扮演一名骑摩托车的人，他的自行车在法国的一个小村庄抛锚了。他得到了玛德琳（玛利亚·施奈德饰）的帮助，玛德琳是一位因未婚生子而被社会排斥的年轻女性。当一名小女孩被骑自行车的人撞倒的消息传开时，当地人将责任归咎于金斯基。

一对身无分文的年轻夫妇决定欺骗一个富有的鳏夫。

　　

　　

　　This movie is also called "Dust of life" in English and was made by Alex Bouchareb in 1994.　　In 1975, 3 kids decide to escape a reeducation camp in the Vietnamese equatorial forest near Cambodia where the Amerasians are imprisoned, tortured both mentally and physically. Son, the hero is sent in that camp after her mother fails to find his father to send him away to America.　　Search the web for the title to find more information. You can find the poster of the movie on cineposters dot com.　　Kind of reminds me of Papillon or the Killing Fields though maybe a notch down in terms of realization... This movie is based on facts from the after war.

　　Eric (Corin Redgrave) is a novelist whose imagination is unusually powerful. While exploring a run-down mansion in the French countryside, looking for sites for his stories, he meets a girl dressed in clothes from another time. Returning to the site, he encounters a modern woman who says he probably met a ghost. He is fascinated by the situation which cannot be what it seems.

　　Magdalena and Maria are two twin sisters who were separated at birth and know nothing of the other’s existence.  Maria runs away from the boarding school in which she was brought up and finds work as a cabaret performer in the cafés of Marseilles.  Magdalena lives with her adopted parents and works in an art gallery.  The two sisters are joined by an invisible bond which draws them towards the same tragic conclusion.　　Director Werner Schroeter has acquired a reputation as an experimentalist filmmaker, hailed by some as an underrated genius, reviled by others for being a peddler of self-indulgent kitsch.  Deux is arguably Schroeter’s most ambitious, unsettling and repulsive work to date.  The director certainly wastes no time in alienating his audience; from the first ten minutes of the film it is clear this is not going to be an easy ride.  The narrative cuts haphazardly between seemingly unconnected events, alternating between realism and stylised fantasy dream sequences, periodically shocking the spectator with graphic images of lesbian sex and a woman being slowly disembowelled.  Having several actors playing multiple parts only adds to the sense of artifice and utter confusion, which is a pity as there is manifestly a lot of great acting talent on show – not least of which is Isabelle Huppert.  The film’s sheer relentless grotesqueness and self-indulgence is so extreme, so unbridled, so stomach-churningly provocative, that it is hard to take any of it seriously.

　　本片荣获2006法国恺撒奖最佳新进演员；2006法国卢米埃尔奖最佳导演；2005法国路易•德吕克大奖；第62届威尼斯电影节最佳导演银狮奖、最佳技术贡献奖（摄影）。　　1968年，五月风暴席卷法国，学生运动风生水起。年轻的诗人弗朗西斯（Louis Garrel 路易斯•加莱尔 饰）逃避兵役，沉湎于大麻、诗歌和爱情之中，与好友安东尼一起，自由挥霍混乱时期的青春。不久一名叫莉莉的女孩出现在弗朗西斯面前，她是个雕塑师，在铸件厂工作。两人很快坠入爱河。　　一年后，弗朗西斯依然过着颓废自由的生活，而机缘之巧合却使莉莉开始认真思考两人的将来……

　　高级应召女郎布蕾蒂被老板惩罚，因为她没有包容一个重要客户。从此刻起，她必须服从所有客户的虐待欲，否则。。。

自从父亲死后，弗莱德雷克（Jean-Loup Philippe 饰）便失去了童年的记忆，但一张挂在墙上的风景画却打开了他记忆的大门。画上是一座建在海边的废弃城堡，弗莱德雷克对此感到似曾相识，他逐渐回忆起20年前发生的一件事，12岁的他邂逅了城堡内一个身穿白...

第一次世界大战开始时，玛尔特·理查德看到她的父母被德国士兵逮捕、带走并枪杀。 当她与未婚夫、西线士兵安德烈失去联系时，这位年轻女子带着一个想法赶往巴黎——通过为她的国家服务来报复德国人。 她被雷蒙德指挥官聘为间谍。 她被派往西班牙的圣塞巴斯蒂安，与两名德国...

　　1984年七月， Varda 在 Avignon 的一棟養老院裡看到一個名為《活生生與人造的》（Le vivant et l'artificiel）的展覽。展覽場裡，藝術品與動物、人工心臟、發霉的牆壁混亂地共存著。視覺上的震憾讓她久久不能自己，於是她決定帶領我們，重回險地。我們看到一間間住宅，或空的、或滿的。隨著時間流逝，卻留下奇怪的痕跡。另外， Varda 也在這家養老院裡遇到了即將是《無法無家》裡的「女僕」 Yolande Moreau 和「老太太」 Marthe Jarnias 。　　Varda 曰：　　『在高速火車的搖晃下，我無法讓自己不去想–那些我的精神正試著去吸納的不協調的影像。一到巴黎，我立刻打電話給 Louis Bec 和 Bernard Faivre d'Arcier ，要求他們讓我去拍這個展覽，不是為了去理解它，而是為了從中汲取靈感。他們答應了。幾天之後，我們出發前往拍片。在回到 Avignon 的高速火車的搖晃下， Nurith Aviv 要求看我的大筆記，好知道他將要拍的是甚麼。筆記紙幾乎還是空白的，我們只看到一些標題：廚房、父母的房間、用餐、窗戶。所有的家庭生活都註記到了，但沒有一樣是準備好了的。整部影片完全是以即興的方式去拍的，沒有標記、沒有脈絡。我只不過是跟隨著因參觀現場而感受到自己真實的心臟跳動，和那些仍然令人感到溫暖的老人的存在。』　　A.   Varda,1993年, in Varda par Agnès, Ed. Cahiers du cinéma, 1994.

　　Un professeur d’histoire qui habite avec son amie d’enfance part pour aller vivre avec une autre femme: sa vie se délite, il abandonne ses cours et se met à boire.

改编自俄国文学巨擎托尔斯泰的小说，以倒叙的手法揭开一名男子杀妻后的种种回忆。侯麦罕见地自导自演，以默片手法伴随旁白解说推动人物内心的波澜，并记录下传奇电影杂志《电影手册》编辑部的办公场景，电影理论“一代宗师”安德烈·巴赞、法国电影新浪潮“五虎将”让-吕克·...

本片改编自美国小说家马克贝恩的《冷眼旁观》，讲述一个孤独年迈的私家侦探，在一桩跟踪一个女强盗的过程中，在利用偷窥对她监视时，不知不觉与她发生了奇异的心灵感应。尽管他们未曾面对面，但这背后隐藏着的阴谋被逐渐揭开。

1995年12月8日，一场突如其来的灾难袭向了家庭事业双得意总编吉恩•多米尼克•鲍比（Mathieu Amalric 饰）他的脑干突然中风，继而引发极其罕见、概率极低的闭锁症候群。罹患此症的吉恩全身瘫痪，只有左眼尚能自由活动。他形容自己就如同困在潜水钟里一般，身体被紧紧箍住，无法动弹，而心灵却像蝴蝶一样在广阔的天地里自由飞翔。吉恩凭借着左眼和顽强的意志以及语音矫正师的协助，与世界做着无声的交流……本片荣获2007年AFI电影节观众奖最佳影片奖；2007年波士顿影评人协会最佳摄影、最佳导演和最佳外语片奖；2007年戛纳电影节最佳导演奖和技术大奖；2008年法国凯撒电影节最佳男主角（Mathieu Amalric）和最佳编剧奖。

1987年，加斯帕尔·诺埃夹着40分钟长度的电影炸弹《马肉》（Carne）进驻了戛纳电影节，拉开了他对社会宣战的序曲。《马肉》开始就是血淋淋的杀马镜头，诺埃采用了后来成为主流电影时髦的“主人公冷叙述法”（《天使爱美丽》的开场叙述），讲述一个马肉店小老板、一个面无表情、缺乏情调、内心封闭的屠夫，日复一日、年复一年过着枯燥生活。面对女儿越来越成熟的肉体他产生了无以自拔的欲望，最终他误以为女儿被人强奸而把屠刀插进了那个家伙的嘴巴。影片弥漫着压抑、干燥、冷冽的气息，画面始终弥漫着血污一样的红，一种暴雨过后阴沟翻滚的腐朽气息，一副肆无忌惮的颓废和末世色彩。奇怪的机位（经常切掉人的眼睛）、僵直的动作，影片除了少量从广播里传出的音乐，令人印象最深的就是不断出现的沉重顿音，让人害怕和不安。 《马肉》在视听语言和社会批判上的直接性令人猝不及防、目瞪口呆。影片开始就明目张胆地写出“本片会让青少年观众产生严重的心理不适”等字样，这类对那些已走进电影院、坐在椅子上的观众毫无意义的警示，在他后来的电影作品不断出现，成为他独一无二的标签。他在电影中直接与观众对话，在《我企硬》结尾的暴力幻想戏之前，诺埃以数秒倒计时的方式请某些保守派观众提前离场。看这样一部电影，你不但会被导演的勇气感到不寒而栗，也会感到他就像一个玩世不恭、心思缜密的流氓，带着冷嘲热讽的表情从人性的最底层猛烈强暴这个世界，甚至还有几分幽默感。在西文中，“玩世不恭”与“犬儒主义”是一个词，它代表一种态度，而我们则经常把这两个词分开用，在中国似乎只有王朔身上高度集中了这两个词的共同含义，玩世不恭地一个都不放过。 《马肉》获得了戛纳电影节国际影评人周奖，很多人劝诺埃拍一部《马肉》的加长版，于是他用了7年时间拍摄了《马肉》的续篇《我企硬》，走向了偏执狂的极限。1985年，他让他的爸爸在自己的短片里演了精神变态杀手，1997年，他自己在好友让·古南（Jan Kounen）的《太保密码》中客串一个卖土耳其烤肉的混混。诺埃与让·古南出现在一起并不奇怪，他们都是电影偏执狂，都对世界毫不让步，都疯狂尝试致幻剂，都拍摄出令人惊心动魄的画面。

　演而優則導的瑪莉路易斯?依莉貝以令人驚豔的光影戲法改編德國文學與音樂中的經典作品《魔王》。導演一方面結合自然場景、歌舞疊影與特技攝影，成功地詮釋歌德敘事詩中的奇幻想像；另方面也巧妙地運用蒙太奇式的剪輯手法，體現舒伯特藝術音樂中充滿動態感的創作調性。依莉貝以懸疑、獨特的視覺語彙成為開創法國有聲電影史新頁的代表人物之一。

富商豪拜与女秘书偷情，被妻子依莱娜雇佣的私家侦探高勒发现。豪拜为了摆脱妻子的纠缠，约请作家热拉尔为其撰写了一部侦探小说，并依照书中的作案情节意图谋害依莱娜。不想热拉尔恰巧搭救了依莱娜。豪拜阴谋未遂，反遭高勒敲诈，他不得不四处应付……而不难不死的依莱娜则按照...

萨洛梅·勒纳刚刚写完一本自传。她参加了一个名为“撇号”的电视节目，该节目由法国电视节目主持人伯纳德·Pivot主持。然后，Pivot想象了一部可以根据她扣人心弦的故事创作的电影。这是一部完全由音乐组成的电影，因为在看到年轻的钢琴家埃里克·贝尔乔特之后，萨洛...

这部电影讲述了一位法兰西王后的一生，讲述了那个年代，法国大革命前贵族们奢华迷乱的生活。奥地利公主玛丽（克尔斯滕•邓斯特 Kirsten Dunst饰）非常聪明，生性活泼，14岁的时候，在一场政治婚姻中，从奥地利公主变成法国的太子妃。由于某些原因，王子对玛丽非常的纵容，婚后，玛丽一直过着极其奢华的生活，同样，玛丽也一直无法与内心的寂寞彻底脱离。这部电影将给我们带来关于18世纪法国宫廷和社会的各种震撼，匪夷所思的奢侈，欲望交织的爱情，以及最后法国人民的怒吼。

NathanDelAmico是一位事业有成的纽约律师，他整日忙于工作，与妻子和女儿日益疏远。Nathan童年曾经历过一次严重的交通事故，险些丧命，准确的说，他在鬼门关里走了一遭又捡回了一条命。某次，他认识了一位神秘的医生Kay（约翰·马尔科维奇饰演），Kay声称自己具有一种超能力——他能预见哪些人死期将至，这些将死之人会散发出一种白光，只有开天眼的人才能看到。作为通灵的“信使”，他的工作就是提醒那些将死的人安排好自己的生活，以免在撒手人寰时留下太多的遗憾。Nathan刚开始觉得这是无稽之谈，但接下来发生的事情让他不得不对Kay深信不疑。

夫妻共同生活十五年，有三个子女，始终敌不过分手的命运。他忘不了她过往的不忠，她受不了他的酒瘾与工作狂。故事细致刻划两人离婚后的生活琐事，流畅的镜头捕捉她如何独力照顾子女起居，落泊的他在西班牙怎样处处碰壁。分开后，彼此都觉得失去了甚么，但那种缺陷，又能否足够...

　　一对夫妻，五个片断。　　离婚、家庭聚会、生育、结婚，还有邂逅，生命中最重要的五个段落在平淡中开始和落幕。看着一脸木讷的律师，分割一切可以分割的东西，财产、房子与孩子。热如烈火，冷如海水，爱情游移在截然对立的两边。只有将自己重新投入回忆之中，检索曾共同走过的道路，才会发现其 实很多不稳定的因素早已深深埋藏。这是倒叙的力量，只有这种方式才能深深震撼每一个恋爱中的男女，看看一曾美好的爱情正以怎样的速度悄悄枯萎……

来自不同历史时期的四个色情故事。第一部《潮水》以现代为背景，讲述一名学生和他年轻的表妹被潮水困在海滩上，躲避窥探的故事。“Therese Philosophe”的故事发生在 19 世纪，讲述了一个女孩被锁在她的卧室里，她在那里沉思着其中所含物品的色情潜力。...

知名电视节目主持人乔治（丹尼尔·奥特尤尔 Daniel Auteuil 饰）与妻子安娜（朱丽叶·比诺什 Juliette Binoche 饰）、儿子皮埃尔一家三口的平静生活被乔治从家门口捡来的录像带打破，这盒录像带显示有人静静地注视着乔治家的一举一动。很快，更多的录像带 和恐吓性质的明信片寄到了乔治及家人手上。乔治对看不见的敌人殊为紧张，开始小心保护儿子，并且为录像带的内容指引，回想起多年以前，差点成为母亲养子的阿尔及利亚遗孤马吉德。乔治怀疑录像带的始作俑者即为马吉德，于是登门拜访，却引发了意外的结局……本片获2005年戛纳电影节最佳导演奖、费比西奖等二十余项专业褒奖。©豆瓣

一位电影制作人正在准备一部电影，这部电影追溯了他个人生活的一个片段：10年前，他离开了妻子，妻子因此自杀。

影片聚焦法国民族女英雄圣女贞德（玛利亚·法奥康涅蒂MariaFalconetti饰）生命的最后时刻，再现了她被出卖落入勃艮第叛军手中后，在英格兰监狱和法庭上，从受审到处死的全过程。被英格兰当局严密控制的天主教会，指控贞德为异端和女巫。法庭上，法官更伪造证据，以信仰问题不断对她施以精神上和肉体上的折磨。面对惨无人道的酷刑与子虚乌有的诬陷，贞德正气凛然、坚贞不屈。最后，贞德被押赴鲁昂市广场，被绑在火刑柱上活活烧死。由一代电影大师卡尔·西奥多·德莱叶执导拍摄的影片《圣女贞德蒙难记》，被称为世界十大最佳影片之一。影片以极具震撼力的艺术表现手法，再现了这段受到天主教会和英国占领军折磨的民族英雄短暂生命中的最后时刻。

主人翁艾曼妞原是忠于丈夫的纯情妻子，跟外交官丈夫前往泰国，遇上一群法国老乡。鸳鸯恋她赫然发现那些贵妇人在异国环境下因感生活沉闷而到处留情，她在别人怂恿下也迈出了偷腥的第一步。不料在她丈夫知悉后，不但未予责怪，竟然鼓励她深入探索自己的内心情欲需求，于是她更加...